From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: haver@vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <dedekind@oktetlabs.ru>,
"Monte K. Copeland" <catboat@texas.net>,
Andreas Arnez <arnez@de.ibm.com>,
MTD Mailinglist <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Schmidt1 <ALEXSCHM@de.ibm.com>,
Alexander
Subject: Re: ubi-utils: Moving mkpfi, pfiflash, ... to old-tools
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:53:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080218105324.1734f9d5@weaponx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203353343.8085.48.camel@august>
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:49:03 +0100
Frank Haverkamp <haver@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 17:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I did not update for some time, but did now and noticed that my
> > packaging scripts need a real overhaul for no benefit.
> >
>
> I talked to Artem. He told me that the tools had deficiencies that
> prevented him using them. E.g. that he could not put the vid-hdr the
> offset he wanted it to put. He promissed me to write up the deficiencies
> so that we can work on them. I am sure that after fixing, we can move
> the tools back to their old location.
I have a patch for the vid header thing. I also have a patch for
bin2nand/nand2bin since they are hard coded to use the SmartMedia ECC
byte ordering.
> Of course it would be nice, if we could move the tools back even before
> the fixup, to avoid changing our build scripts. Let us discuss that with
> Artem tomorrow.
I'm a bit grumpy about the move as well, not because they were moved,
but because there's a dozen or so completely useless commits in the
repo. But, oh well.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 13:49 ubi-utils: Moving mkpfi, pfiflash, ... to old-tools Frank Haverkamp
2008-02-18 15:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-02-18 16:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-18 16:49 ` Frank Haverkamp
2008-02-18 16:53 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2008-02-19 8:47 ` Frank Haverkamp
2008-02-19 12:29 ` Josh Boyer
2008-02-19 12:56 ` Frank Haverkamp
2008-02-18 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-20 10:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-02-19 9:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-02-19 9:57 ` Frank Haverkamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080218105324.1734f9d5@weaponx \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ALEXSCHM@de.ibm.com \
--cc=arnez@de.ibm.com \
--cc=catboat@texas.net \
--cc=dedekind@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=haver@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.