From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1JRwMi-0001PW-5h for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:20:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRwMg-0001Mn-GM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:20:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRwMe-0001Kq-Qx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:20:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRwMe-0001Kh-NL for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:20:28 -0500 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=nexedi.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRwMe-0006ou-E8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:20:28 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by nexedi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBE93D92A for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:28:24 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:20:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20080208161534.GA19324@thorin> <20080217141823.GE8497@boeglin.org> In-Reply-To: <20080217141823.GE8497@boeglin.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802202220.24048.okuji@enbug.org> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sleep.mod X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:20:30 -0000 On Sunday 17 February 2008 15:18, Alexandre Boeglin wrote: > I have a few issues with this on a EFI machine: > - if I press any other key but ESC, the sleep command is not interruptible > anymore > - the keys I press are read when the command returns > > Does this happen on other machines as well ? It must be consistent with all architectures, since the terminal API assumes a FIFO buffer for key inputs. Anyway, I don't like the current implementation of sleep. Robert, are you going to change it according to our discussion? Okuji