From: Jim Westfall <jwestfall@surrealistic.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:95!
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080221191352.GV84358@surrealistic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220.215707.194209573.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote [02.20.08]:
> From: Jim Westfall <jwestfall@surrealistic.net>
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:46:48 -0800
>
> > static inline void llc_pdu_init_as_test_rsp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct sk_buff *ev_skb)
> > {
> > struct llc_pdu_un *pdu = llc_pdu_un_hdr(skb);
> >
> > pdu->ctrl_1 = LLC_PDU_TYPE_U;
> > pdu->ctrl_1 |= LLC_1_PDU_CMD_TEST;
> > pdu->ctrl_1 |= LLC_U_PF_BIT_MASK;
> > if (ev_skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_802_2)) {
> > struct llc_pdu_un *ev_pdu = llc_pdu_un_hdr(ev_skb);
> > int dsize;
> >
> > dsize = ntohs(eth_hdr(ev_skb)->h_proto) - 3;
> > memcpy(((u8 *)pdu) + 3, ((u8 *)ev_pdu) + 3, dsize);
> > skb_put(skb, dsize);
> > }
> > ..
> > }
>
> Probably what should happen is:
>
I just started looking at the skbuff|net|llc code last night, hopefully
these aren't totally stupid questions/comments.
> 1) First this function validates that there are really
> 'dsize' bytes available in the ev_skb source.
looks like this can be done easily with skb_tailroom()..
I am curious if we should also be verifying that dsize is valid? Its
value is coming from a recv'd llc packet.
The llc header is |mac|mac|16bit length|. The above code seems to be
piggy backing a normal ethernet header struct, by using h_proto as the
llc length. I am not sure if that length value can be trusted and we run
the risk of memcpy'ing off the end of the source structure/skbuff?
>
> 2) Second, skb_realloc_headroom() is called on 'skb' with
> a second argument of 'dsize'.
This suggestion escapes me. The skb_put() call in the above
code would increase skb->tail. Wont skb_realloc_headroom() create
additional space between skb->head and skb->data when we really want it
between skb->tail and skb->end?
thanks
jim
>
> That means also this function now needs to return error
> values, and the callers updated to handle that.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-20 0:20 kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:95! Jim Westfall
2008-02-21 5:46 ` Jim Westfall
2008-02-21 5:57 ` David Miller
2008-02-21 19:13 ` Jim Westfall [this message]
2008-02-24 4:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080221191352.GV84358@surrealistic.net \
--to=jwestfall@surrealistic.net \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.