From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1MJwFqs010406 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:58:15 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1MJvibq012519 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:57:44 -0500 From: Peter Missel To: hermann pitton , video4linux-list@redhat.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:57:35 +0100 References: <200802202341.32370.werner.braun@gmx.de> <1203634149.8866.14.camel@pc08.localdom.local> In-Reply-To: <1203634149.8866.14.camel@pc08.localdom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802222057.35863.peter.missel@onlinehome.de> Cc: Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] auto detection of Flytv duo/hybrid and pci/cardbus confusion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Hi guys! > > Werner, yes it was your device coming back in mind. > > We know now about the new A/D version V1.1, saw only a fuzzy picture so > far, but looks like a KS003 something for the remote and not that PIC on > the prior, different addresses, IIRC. > If you ask me, that V1.1 card doesn't look anything like any LifeView design I've seen so far. It wouldn't be the first time MSI sell a totally different card than before under the same product name, as "just a newer revision". The use of MSI's own PCI vendor ID 1462h in the subsystem ID also hints that it isn't a LifeView card as we know them, since they have never ever used an OEM's specific ID. It's always been 4E42h ever since the subsystem ID was invented. Just my two cents. regards, Peter -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list