From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_spi: Fix clock polarity
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:05:07 -0800
Message-ID: <20080223000507.3863d71f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20080221.111138.41629131.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
	spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo-7JcRY8pycbNHfZP73Gtkiw@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080221.111138.41629131.nemoto-IGagC74glE2asRnM1LW+pc8NsWr+9BEh@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general>,
	<mailto:spi-devel-general-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=spi-devel-general>
List-Post: <mailto:spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spi-devel-general-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general>,
	<mailto:spi-devel-general-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:11:38 +0900 (JST) Atsushi Nemoto <anemo-7JcRY8pycbNHfZP73Gtkiw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> This patch is already in mm tree as atmel_spi-fix-clock-polarity.patch.
> I just rewrite description slightly and add my signed-off and acked-by
> from Haavard Skinnemoen.

I had it queued for 2.6.26 which I guess was wrong.  I'll bump it into
2.6.25.  Is it needed in 2.6.24.x?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1763885AbYBWIJk@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1763885AbYBWIJk (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:09:40 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764848AbYBWIGI
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:06:08 -0500
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:51191 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761711AbYBWIFb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:05:31 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:05:07 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
       Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>,
       spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_spi: Fix clock polarity
Message-Id: <20080223000507.3863d71f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080221.111138.41629131.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
References: <20080221.111138.41629131.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:11:38 +0900 (JST) Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

> This patch is already in mm tree as atmel_spi-fix-clock-polarity.patch.
> I just rewrite description slightly and add my signed-off and acked-by
> from Haavard Skinnemoen.

I had it queued for 2.6.26 which I guess was wrong.  I'll bump it into
2.6.25.  Is it needed in 2.6.24.x?