All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: zhangrui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] ACPI: ignore processors that doesn't support hot plug
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:53:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802230153.56710.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203664638.3210.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Friday 22 February 2008 02:17, zhangrui wrote:
> is_processor_present is only called in the processor hotplug case,
> and _STA method is mandatory at this time.
> 
> We should ignore those processors that are disabled in the MADT
> and don't have _STA methods.
> Because they will never exist in this system.
> For the processors that don't physically exist but can be
> hot plugged later, we still need this debug info.
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8570
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

Okay.  As the original patch shipped in rc1,
below is the incremental.

thanks,
-Len

Subject: ACPI Exception (): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present (update)
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

update cfaf3747ff3d431fba33f75083b7f50f58ae22ff
ACPI: ACPI Exception (): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present

is_processor_present is only called in the processor hotplug case,
and _STA method is mandatory at this time.

We should ignore those processors that are disabled in the MADT
and don't have _STA methods.
Because they will never exist in this system.
For the processors that don't physically exist but can be
hot plugged later, we still need this debug info.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8570

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index a3cc8a9..d9316ab 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -840,17 +840,19 @@ static int is_processor_present(acpi_handle handle)
 
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
-	/*
-	 * if a processor object does not have an _STA object,
-	 * OSPM assumes that the processor is present.
-	 */
-	if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
-		return 1;
 
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT))
 		return 1;
 
-	ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Processor Device is not present"));
+	/*
+	 * _STA is mandatory for a processor that supports hot plug
+	 */
+	if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
+		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+				"Processor does not support hot plug\n"));
+	else
+		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
+				"Processor Device is not present"));
 	return 0;
 }
 

      reply	other threads:[~2008-02-23  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-22  7:17 [Patch] ACPI: ignore processors that doesn't support hot plug zhangrui
2008-02-23  6:53 ` Len Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200802230153.56710.lenb@kernel.org \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.