All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Update the sysfs interface documentation
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:57:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080223105753.77ef8382@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070820164444.48e68a63@hyperion.delvare>

* Document the characteristics of libsensors 3.0.0 and 3.0.1.
* The sysfs interface is no longer subject to changes.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
 Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface |   33 +++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.25-rc2.orig/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface	2008-01-25 10:26:47.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc2/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface	2008-02-23 10:47:34.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,17 +2,12 @@ Naming and data format standards for sys
 ------------------------------------------------
 
 The libsensors library offers an interface to the raw sensors data
-through the sysfs interface. See libsensors documentation and source for
-further information. As of writing this document, libsensors
-(from lm_sensors 2.8.3) is heavily chip-dependent. Adding or updating
-support for any given chip requires modifying the library's code.
-This is because libsensors was written for the procfs interface
-older kernel modules were using, which wasn't standardized enough.
-Recent versions of libsensors (from lm_sensors 2.8.2 and later) have
-support for the sysfs interface, though.
-
-The new sysfs interface was designed to be as chip-independent as
-possible.
+through the sysfs interface. Since lm-sensors 3.0.0, libsensors is
+completely chip-independent. It assumes that all the kernel drivers
+implement the standard sysfs interface described in this document.
+This makes adding or updating support for any given chip very easy, as
+libsensors, and applications using it, do not need to be modified.
+This is a major improvement compared to lm-sensors 2.
 
 Note that motherboards vary widely in the connections to sensor chips.
 There is no standard that ensures, for example, that the second
@@ -35,19 +30,17 @@ access this data in a simple and consist
 will have to implement conversion, labeling and hiding of inputs. For
 this reason, it is still not recommended to bypass the library.
 
-If you are developing a userspace application please send us feedback on
-this standard.
-
-Note that this standard isn't completely established yet, so it is subject
-to changes. If you are writing a new hardware monitoring driver those
-features can't seem to fit in this interface, please contact us with your
-extension proposal. Keep in mind that backward compatibility must be
-preserved.
-
 Each chip gets its own directory in the sysfs /sys/devices tree.  To
 find all sensor chips, it is easier to follow the device symlinks from
 /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon*.
 
+Up to lm-sensors 3.0.0, libsensors looks for hardware monitoring attributes
+in the "physical" device directory. Since lm-sensors 3.0.1, attributes found
+in the hwmon "class" device directory are also supported. Complex drivers
+(e.g. drivers for multifunction chips) may want to use this possibility to
+avoid namespace pollution. The only drawback will be that older versions of
+libsensors won't support the driver in question.
+
 All sysfs values are fixed point numbers.
 
 There is only one value per file, unlike the older /proc specification.


-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-23  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-20 14:44 [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Update the sysfs interface documentation Jean Delvare
2007-08-20 20:51 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Update the sysfs interface Hans de Goede
2007-08-26 18:50 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-08-27  8:22 ` Jean Delvare
2008-02-23  9:57 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-04-09 17:16 ` Juerg Haefliger
2008-05-26 15:54 ` Mark M. Hoffman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080223105753.77ef8382@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.