From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarod Wilson Subject: Re: Unknown p4-clockmode capable CPU Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:02:01 -0500 Message-ID: <200802250902.01276.jwilson@redhat.com> References: <47C25A7C.3020305@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47C25A7C.3020305@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Cc: Emmanuel Andreu On Monday 25 February 2008 01:04:44 am Emmanuel Andreu wrote: > Hello, > > Cpufreqd tells me at syslog : > Feb 24 22:57:23 underworld kernel: [ 247.512000] p4-clockmod: Unknown > p4-clockmod-capable CPU. Please send an e-mail to > . > My CPU is a Celeron M 530, that works "fine" (a little bit slowly !!) on > Vista, but that doesn't get recognized yet, neither by p4-clockmod, nor > by all the lm-sensors stuff. Laptops running this CPU (most "low cost > long battery-life" recent laptops, in my case the Lenovn 3000 N200 > 0769-A42) will have to run with full speed CPU and sometimes overheat > problems, for now). > > Hope my little report will help, best regards, Something that new hopefully works with acpi-cpufreq instead of the ancient and crappy p4-clockmod. Have you tried acpi-cpufreq instead? -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@redhat.com