From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "IB/fmr_pool: ib_fmr_pool_flush() should flush all dirty FMRs" Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:39:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20080226193901.GD6029@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080225225330.GA3316@osc.edu> <20080226182655.GD7033@osc.edu> <20080226182731.GE7033@osc.edu> <47C46715.2090603@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C46715.2090603@panasas.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Benny Halevy Cc: Pete Wyckoff , Roland Dreier , Olaf Kirch , general@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:23:01AM -0800, Benny Halevy wrote: > Pete, the subject says "PATCH 1/2" but I didn't see any follow-up message > for PATCH 2/2. Just wondering :) I think the problem's on your end ... I got it and so did marc: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120405067313933&w=2 -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."