From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: - remove-rcu_assign_pointernull-penalty-with-type-macro-safety.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:57:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802290907.m1T97HBc014729@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
remove-rcu_assign_pointernull-penalty-with-type-macro-safety.patch
This patch was dropped because it had testing failures
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: remove rcu_assign_pointer(NULL) penalty with type/macro safety
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This is an updated version of the patch posted last November:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071201.003721.cd6ff17c.en.html
This new version permits arguments with side effects, for example:
rcu_assign_pointer(global_p, p++);
and also verifies that the arguments are pointers, while still avoiding the
unnecessary memory barrier when assigning NULL to a pointer. This
memory-barrier avoidance means that rcu_assign_pointer() is now only
permitted for pointers (not array indexes), and so this version emits a
compiler warning if the first argument is not a pointer. I built a "make
allyesconfig" version on an x86 system, and received no such warnings. If
RCU is ever applied to array indexes, then the second patch in this series
should be applied, and the resulting rcu_assign_index() be used.
Given the rather surprising history of subtlely broken implementations of
rcu_assign_pointer(), I took the precaution of generating a full set of
test cases and verified that memory barriers and compiler warnings were
emitted when required. I guess it is the simple things that get you...
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/rcupdate.h~remove-rcu_assign_pointernull-penalty-with-type-macro-safety include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h~remove-rcu_assign_pointernull-penalty-with-type-macro-safety
+++ a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -172,14 +172,19 @@ struct rcu_head {
* structure after the pointer assignment. More importantly, this
* call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side
* code.
+ *
+ * Throws a compiler warning for non-pointer arguments.
+ *
+ * Does not insert a memory barrier for a NULL pointer.
*/
-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
({ \
- if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \
- ((v) != NULL)) \
+ typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (v); \
+ \
+ if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || (_________p1 != NULL)) \
smp_wmb(); \
- (p) = (v); \
+ (p) = _________p1; \
})
/**
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
git-sched.patch
kthread-add-a-missing-memory-barrier-to-kthread_stop.patch
kthread-call-wake_up_process-without-the-lock-being-held.patch
remove-rcu_assign_pointernull-penalty-with-type-macro-safety.patch
add-rcu_assign_index-if-ever-needed.patch
add-rcu_assign_index-if-ever-needed-fix.patch
rcu-split-listh-and-move-rcu-protected-lists-into-rculisth.patch
lock_task_sighand-add-rcu-lock-unlock.patch
k_getrusage-dont-take-rcu_read_lock.patch
do_task_stat-dont-take-rcu_read_lock.patch
reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802290907.m1T97HBc014729@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.