From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759995AbYCCSxQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:53:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752814AbYCCSxA (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:53:00 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:36184 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752257AbYCCSxA (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:53:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:52:53 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: "Paul Menage" Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, maxk@qualcomm.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@tv-sign.ru, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities Message-Id: <20080303125253.5d2d580c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830803031041r6c635141n6520a915f2e1d08@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080227222103.673194000@chello.nl> <1204311351.6243.130.camel@lappy> <20080229190223.GA17820@elte.hu> <47C87084.3090208@qualcomm.com> <1204318980.6243.133.camel@lappy> <47C8771C.1070001@qualcomm.com> <1204545445.11412.6.camel@twins> <20080303113621.1dfdda87.pj@sgi.com> <1204567052.6241.4.camel@lappy> <20080303121033.c8c9651c.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830803031041r6c635141n6520a915f2e1d08@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul M wrote: > It ... would allow memory and CPU assignments to be controlled > independently. Could you motivate this suggestion -- who needs it, or why would is it needed? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214