All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] [POWERPC] Ignore disabled serial ports
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:21:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080303132107.67200634@weaponx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303190925.GA6735@loki.buserror.net>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:09:25 -0600
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:43:17PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 04:43:42 +0100
> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > I wonder whether we should move the check for "used-by-rtas" into the
> > > of_device_is_available function. I understand that used-by-rtas is
> > > another way of expressing the idea that the kernel is not supposed to
> > > access the specific device. In this case, the device is physically
> > > present, but is not available to the OS.
> > 
> > I'd rather not at the moment.  My intention was to only look at the
> > status property for now.  I'd like to avoid this function growing into
> > a huge switch statement for $random_firmware's way of flagging
> > something as "don't touch".
> 
> Better that than having the "huge" list of tests in every driver...

Perhaps.

This isn't set in stone.  I'd rather get what's in the patch in-tree
now and massage it as we go.  Otherwise this bike shed will wind up
being rainbow colored yet totally useless because it's a never-ending
patch rework.

josh

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-03 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-01 14:16 [PATCH 1/2 v2] [OF] Add of_device_is_available function Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] [POWERPC] Ignore disabled serial ports Josh Boyer
2008-03-03  3:43   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-03  4:43     ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-03 19:09       ` Scott Wood
2008-03-03 19:21         ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2008-03-03 21:40           ` Nathan Lynch
2008-03-04  0:42             ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-03-01 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/2][NEWEMAC] Use status property for unused/unwired EMACs Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 21:33   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-01 23:50     ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-02 19:43   ` Sean MacLennan
2008-03-02 22:23     ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 22:02 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] [OF] Add of_device_is_available function Stephen Rothwell
2008-03-01 22:25   ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-01 23:48 ` [RESEND] " Josh Boyer
2008-03-24 11:39   ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-24 11:45     ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-25  4:47     ` Sean MacLennan
2008-03-25 11:51       ` Josh Boyer
2008-03-26 14:25         ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080303132107.67200634@weaponx \
    --to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.