From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabor FUNK <FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:29:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304062942.GA14335@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CCC1C6.5010600@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:28:06PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I am pretty much convinced at this point that my exceptions/resetting
> > problem is due to the PSU. I've been testing different configurations
> > lately and was able to get stable system powering 14 (!) drives by both
> > PSUs together. The limiting factor is Amps on a single +12V rail:
> > Coolermaster 750 limits single rail to 19A (6 drives @ 2.8A/drive) and
> > my old Enermax 550 has 24A limit (8 drives @ 2.8A/drive). Even though
> > Coolermaster 750 has 4 rails, the wiring is not optimal and only 1 rail
> > is available for the hard drives...
> >
> > See item #8 here:
> > http://www.pcpower.com/technology/myths/
>
> Ah... yeah, that's what I've been saying all along. Fancy powers w/
> multiple 12v rails suck for storage array. My 15$ no name single lane
> PSU works much better than 40$ dual lane one.
I've got the first exception (but not reset) in several days running in
the above configuration:
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x00020002, device error via D2H FIS
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: cmd ef/42:fe:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 0
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] res 51/04:fe:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x1 (device error)
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] ata1: EH complete
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Mar 3 19:09:04 [kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Is it something I should be worried about?
> > Tejun,
> >
> > As one of the Gurus on this list, can you suggest any tweaks/settings
> > to try out to improve/resolve my 17 MB/s write speed limit?
>
> How did you test? W/ dd? hdparm?
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.03 seconds = 56.16 MB/sec
# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 117.053 s, 17.9 MB/s
# dd if=file of=file1 bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 161.721 s, 13.0 MB/s
# dd if=file of=/dev/null bs=100M count=20
20+0 records in
20+0 records out
2097152000 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 34.6141 s, 60.6 MB/s
A similar drive in an ICH7 box shows more consistent results:
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 182 MB in 3.01 seconds = 60.48 MB/sec
# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=100M count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 242.908 s, 43.2 MB/s
# dd if=file of=/dev/null bs=100M count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 211.132 s, 49.7 MB/s
Please let me know if you need more details/logs. Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 2:09 sata_sil24 stability and performance Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 4:36 ` Jim Paris
2008-02-19 6:39 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 15:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-02 6:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-02 9:39 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-04 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 0:22 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-04 3:28 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 6:29 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2008-03-05 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 4:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 6:55 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 7:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-15 21:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-17 3:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 0:15 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-18 4:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 6:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 22:37 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-21 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 1:19 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-04-14 2:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 10:55 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 9:14 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 13:06 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 20:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 20:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080304062942.GA14335@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jim@jtan.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.