From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ego@in.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, Ted Tso <tytso@us.ibm.com>,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
bunk@kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:22:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304202207.GA10926@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080303185511.GE12453@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello!
The original preemptible-RCU patch put the choice between classic and
preemptible RCU into kernel/Kconfig.preempt, which resulted in build
failures on machines not supporting CONFIG_PREEMPT. This choice was
therefore moved to init/Kconfig, which worked, but placed the choice
between classic and preemptible RCU at the top level, a very obtuse choice
indeed. This patch changes from the Kconfig "choice" mechanism to a pair
of booleans, only one of which (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) is user-visible,
and is located in kernel/Kconfig.preempt, where one would expect it
to be. The other (CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU) is in init/Kconfig so that it
is available to all architectures, hopefully avoiding build breakage.
Thanks to Roman Zippel for suggesting this approach.
I have tested this, but sadly do not have access to a machine that does
not support CONFIG_PREEMPT. However, I did edit my config in an attempt
to simulate this situation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 34 +++-------------------------------
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.25-rc3/init/Kconfig linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/init/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3/init/Kconfig 2008-02-26 16:58:42.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/init/Kconfig 2008-03-01 11:30:59.000000000 -0800
@@ -860,38 +860,10 @@ source "block/Kconfig"
config PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
bool
-choice
- prompt "RCU implementation type:"
- default CLASSIC_RCU
- help
- This allows you to choose either the classic RCU implementation
- that is designed for best read-side performance on non-realtime
- systems, or the preemptible RCU implementation for best latency
- on realtime systems. Note that some kernel preemption modes
- will restrict your choice.
-
- Select the default if you are unsure.
-
config CLASSIC_RCU
- bool "Classic RCU"
+ def_bool !PREEMPT_RCU
help
This option selects the classic RCU implementation that is
designed for best read-side performance on non-realtime
- systems.
-
- Say Y if you are unsure.
-
-config PREEMPT_RCU
- bool "Preemptible RCU"
- depends on PREEMPT
- help
- This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making certain
- RCU sections preemptible. Normally RCU code is non-preemptible, if
- this option is selected then read-only RCU sections become
- preemptible. This helps latency, but may expose bugs due to
- now-naive assumptions about each RCU read-side critical section
- remaining on a given CPU through its execution.
-
- Say N if you are unsure.
-
-endchoice
+ systems. Classic RCU is the default. Note that the
+ PREEMPT_RCU symbol is used to select/deselect this option.
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/Kconfig.preempt linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
--- linux-2.6.25-rc3/kernel/Kconfig.preempt 2008-02-26 16:58:42.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc3-preempt_rcu/kernel/Kconfig.preempt 2008-03-01 11:35:39.000000000 -0800
@@ -52,8 +52,23 @@ config PREEMPT
endchoice
+config PREEMPT_RCU
+ bool "Preemptible RCU"
+ depends on PREEMPT
+ default n
+ help
+ This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making certain
+ RCU sections preemptible. Normally RCU code is non-preemptible, if
+ this option is selected then read-only RCU sections become
+ preemptible. This helps latency, but may expose bugs due to
+ now-naive assumptions about each RCU read-side critical section
+ remaining on a given CPU through its execution.
+
+ Say N if you are unsure.
+
config RCU_TRACE
bool "Enable tracing for RCU - currently stats in debugfs"
+ depends on PREEMPT_RCU
select DEBUG_FS
default y
help
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-04 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 17:03 [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] Preempt-RCU: Use softirq instead of tasklets for RCU Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] Preempt-RCU: Reorganize RCU code into rcuclassic.c and rcupdate.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-14 14:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2007-12-14 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] Preempt-RCU: Fix rcu_barrier for preemptive environment Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:16 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2008-02-29 4:34 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 4:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-02-29 12:38 ` Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-01 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-01 21:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-03-02 3:09 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-02 3:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-03 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-03-04 20:55 ` [PATCH] move PREEMPT_RCU config option back under PREEMPT Steven Rostedt
2008-03-05 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-05 2:06 ` Roman Zippel
2008-03-05 19:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-03-04 20:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] Preempt-RCU: Implementation Roman Zippel
2008-02-29 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-02-29 14:31 ` Roman Zippel
2007-12-13 17:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] Preempt-RCU: CPU Hotplug handling Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] Preempt-RCU: Update RCU Documentation Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:18 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 21:06 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-12-13 21:09 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-12-13 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080304202207.GA10926@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@us.ibm.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.