From: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Dave Winchell <dwinchell@virtualiron.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Deepak Patel <deepak.patel@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: (progress on hpet accuracy) and Re: [PATCH] Add a timer mode that disables pending missed ticks
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:53:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080305105332234.00000002164@djm-pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CEDBA0.20103@virtualiron.com>
> >Do you see and simply ignore warning messages from 64-bit
> Linux when using
> >hpet (or otherwise not doing missed-tick handling in Xen),
> by the way? I
> >know 64-bit Linux is keen to warn about missed ticks,
> although it does look
> >like at least the warning is one shot.
> >
> >
> I see the one shot messages on 64 bit and no complaints at
> all on 4u432
> Linux.
> And I have been ignoring them.
Code to print the complaints is x86_64-specific in 2.6.9 and 2.6.18.
On 64-bit, a command line parameter of "report_lost_ticks" will
enable a complaint for every lost tick.
As of 2.6.24, the lost ticks message seems to have gone away
completely.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-05 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 14:28 [PATCH] Add a timer mode that disables pending missed ticks Shan, Haitao
2007-10-30 16:12 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-30 21:16 ` Dave Winchell
2007-10-31 7:09 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-01 21:14 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-01 21:21 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-02 9:40 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-02 15:51 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-02 16:14 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-02 16:35 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-02 18:05 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-03 21:17 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-03 22:31 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-05 14:36 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-07 14:39 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-07 14:39 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-07 16:23 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-07 17:10 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-07 17:29 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-07 17:47 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-07 19:38 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-08 8:07 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-08 14:43 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-08 14:53 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-08 15:08 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-09 19:22 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-10 10:55 ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-12 15:37 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-26 20:57 ` Dave Winchell
2007-12-06 11:57 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-19 18:57 ` Dan Magenheimer
2007-12-19 19:32 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-03 22:57 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-01-03 23:24 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-04 23:24 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-08 14:33 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-09 16:53 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-09 17:19 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-01-09 19:14 ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25 23:50 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-01-27 21:21 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-28 0:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-01-28 15:21 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-29 22:34 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-01-30 15:25 ` Dave Winchell
2008-01-30 21:04 ` Deepak Patel
2008-01-30 21:44 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-01 22:31 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-04 20:07 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-08 21:21 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-11 16:52 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-14 15:59 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-14 16:21 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-14 17:55 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-15 16:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-15 17:28 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-19 15:26 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-19 17:55 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-19 19:29 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-19 20:50 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-19 23:38 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-20 23:40 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-25 16:42 ` Dan Magenheimer
2008-02-25 20:01 ` (progress on hpet accuracy) and " Dave Winchell
2008-02-26 8:26 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-26 14:45 ` Dave Winchell
2008-02-26 14:56 ` Keir Fraser
2008-02-26 15:49 ` Dave Winchell
2008-03-05 15:06 ` Dave Winchell
2008-03-05 15:20 ` Keir Fraser
2008-03-05 17:25 ` Dave Winchell
2008-03-05 17:21 ` Keir Fraser
2008-03-05 17:42 ` Dave Winchell
2008-03-05 17:53 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2008-03-06 23:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2007-12-19 19:40 ` Dave Winchell
2007-11-08 14:57 ` Dave Winchell
2007-10-31 3:10 ` Shan, Haitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080305105332234.00000002164@djm-pc \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=deepak.patel@oracle.com \
--cc=dwinchell@virtualiron.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.