From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Speedfreq-SMI call clobbers ECX Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:56:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20080306105603.GL13391@elte.hu> References: <200803051559.09962.langer_mann@web.de> <20080305153520.GB19300@elte.hu> <200803060938.20944.langer_mann@web.de> <200803060951.12002.langer_mann@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803060951.12002.langer_mann@web.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Stephan Diestelhorst Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk * Stephan Diestelhorst wrote: > Again, should I provide these patches? This thing just annoyed me for > a while as I have been patching it in my personal kernels for too > long. yes, please do keep sending them (and any other patches you might have) - it's a real issue on real hardware so we want this fix upstream. Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765729AbYCFLBE (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 06:01:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764038AbYCFK43 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:56:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40221 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760468AbYCFK4Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:56:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:56:03 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephan Diestelhorst Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Speedfreq-SMI call clobbers ECX Message-ID: <20080306105603.GL13391@elte.hu> References: <200803051559.09962.langer_mann@web.de> <20080305153520.GB19300@elte.hu> <200803060938.20944.langer_mann@web.de> <200803060951.12002.langer_mann@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803060951.12002.langer_mann@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0031] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stephan Diestelhorst wrote: > Again, should I provide these patches? This thing just annoyed me for > a while as I have been patching it in my personal kernels for too > long. yes, please do keep sending them (and any other patches you might have) - it's a real issue on real hardware so we want this fix upstream. Ingo