Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:18:56PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git
> (tar balls at
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).
> 
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files
> in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with
> allmodconfig for both powerpc and x86_64.
> 
> There were a few merge conflicts (trivial) and one build break.  I have
> notified the appropriate people.
> 
> We are up to 44 trees, more are welcome (even if they are currently
> empty).  The influx of new trees has been underwhelming.  Thanks to those
> who have contributed, and to those who haven't, please do.
> 
> Status of my local build tests is at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/.  If maintainers want to
> give advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open
> to add more builds.  Build results from today on also include the actual
> compiler version string.
> 
> It looks like this one is going to build fail the same way as yesterday's tree:
> 
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c:633: error: 'struct usb_device' has no member named 'persist_enabled'
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c:719: error: 'struct usb_device' has no member named 'reset_resume'
> 
> for any config with CONFIG_PM disabled.

I have a patch in my to-apply queue for this, so hopefully it will not
happen tomorrow :)

thanks,

greg k-h