From: "Lars Täuber" <taeuber@bbaw.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 16 HDDs too much for RAID6?
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:45:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080307114555.6ce17158.taeuber@bbaw.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080307084146.GA9653@percy.comedia.it>
Hi guys,
Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> schrieb:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:16:21PM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> >On 11:55, Lars Täuber wrote:
> >> monosan:~ # cat /etc/mdadm.conf
> >> DEVICE partitions
> >> ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 UUID=d9d31de2:e6dbd3c3:37c7ea09:882a64e5
> >> ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid1 UUID=a8687183:a79e514c:ca492c4b:ffd4384f
> >> ARRAY /dev/md4 level=raid6 num-devices=16 UUID=8d596319:4d21dba3:3871bccf:5b90a66d
> >
> >Does it help to list only the 16 devices that are used for the array,
> >i.e. something like
> >
> > DEVICE /dev/sd[a-p]
because the devices sd[c-z] and sda[a-h] are used by multipathd they are accessible in read only mode only. For writing /dev/dm-* devices are available.
> i hope kernel will pevent you from doing something this stupid, but i am
> not that sure.
> if you wanna check if the problem is device selection a more appropriate
> line would be
> DEVICE /dev/mapper/mpath*
> or
> DEVICE /dev/dm-[0-9] /dev/dm-1[0-5]
Correct.
My mdadm.conf has now this line for safety:
DEVICE /dev/sd[ab][0-9] /dev/dm-*
But this doesn't really changed anything.
> >I think this is what is confusing mdadm. Your "DEVICE partitions"
> >line instructs mdadm to consider all devices in /proc/partitions,
> >so it finds both sdy and sdi.
> in this case i believe the error message would be different
>
> >> Is there a way to get more verbose infos or debug this anyhow?
>
> you could try with the --verbose option and post the results here.
>
> also could you check if the minor number of /dev/dm-* are really unique?
>
> in case this yelds no result we will have to add some more printf in
> Assemble.c.
I zeroed out all physical devices completely:
# for DEV in /dev/sd[c-r]; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$DEV; done
Now the problem is gone. I don't know what really caused the problem.
Many thanks for your suggestions.
Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-07 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 9:01 16 HDDs too much for RAID6? Lars Täuber
2008-03-06 9:45 ` Andre Noll
2008-03-06 10:55 ` Lars Täuber
2008-03-06 16:16 ` Andre Noll
2008-03-07 8:41 ` Luca Berra
2008-03-07 10:33 ` Andre Noll
2008-03-07 10:45 ` Lars Täuber [this message]
2008-03-28 9:20 ` Reopen: " Lars Täuber
2008-03-28 10:14 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-03-28 10:27 ` Lars Täuber
2008-03-28 10:35 ` Bernd Schubert
2008-03-28 10:55 ` Lars Täuber
2008-03-28 11:20 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080307114555.6ce17158.taeuber@bbaw.de \
--to=taeuber@bbaw.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.