All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle@coredump.us>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git]
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:18:58 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080309221858.GS155407@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803081555.11695.Chris.Knadle@coredump.us>

On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:55:08PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:29:07PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > During the final unmount before reboot there was an assertion failure
> > > from XFS 
> ...
> > > When replying please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed to the list.
> ...
> > > Assertion failed: atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans) == 0, file:
> > > fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c, line: 708
> 
>    Thank you for taking the time to look and reply to this.
> 
> > Known problem. Race in the VFS w.r.t. read-only remounts:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120106649923499&w=2
> 
>    At the bottom of the above message there's a patch which is not currently 
> merged in either the linux-2.6.24.y.git or linux-2.6.git trees.  That's 
> perhaps as it should be, but I would like to know if it's worth trying 
> merging the patch locally as an attempted workaround until such time as 
> 2.6.25 is released and stable.

Sure, the patch is harmless - I've had it running in my local tree for
quite some time now.

> 
> > The fix for the problem lies outside XFS:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120109304227035&w=2
> 
>    If I understand the above correctly, it sounds like the per-vfsmount is 
> going to be a new feature committed to 2.6.25, but probably not backported to 
> prior kernel trees.

Right.

> If this feature was was added at 2.6.23.9 then if I 
> understand corectly it's only an issue between that version and 2.6.25; is 
> that correct?

Only if the per-vfsmount writer counts got merged in 2.6.25-rcX. I'm not sure
that they did. Christoph?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-09 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07  4:29 assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git] Chris Knadle
2008-03-07 22:46 ` David Chinner
2008-03-08 20:55   ` Chris Knadle
2008-03-09 22:18     ` David Chinner [this message]
2008-03-10  6:10       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080309221858.GS155407@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=Chris.Knadle@coredump.us \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.