From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.169.183.159] (helo=coruscant.onosendai.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ14h-0001MV-Ip for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:47:18 +0100 Received: from firewall.tw.openmoko.org ([124.219.5.210] helo=tamarin.local) by coruscant.onosendai.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ12o-0004EU-SV for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:45:15 +0100 From: Holger Freyther To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:45:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200803110807.11368.zecke@selfish.org> <47D64717.3050804@gmail.com> <20080311113256.461ad5d1@widy.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20080311113256.461ad5d1@widy.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200803111045.12166.zecke@selfish.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.169.183.159 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: zecke@selfish.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Reconsidering the work flow and how the SCM system fits in X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:47:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 11 March 2008 10:32:56 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Oh really? Because I would think that loving to see them makes little > sense. It makes sense only to use them. And who will use them? > Because if people wanted to use them, they would do that already. > Actually, people who want, do. I want to use them, I'm sure others would use them (if there is a good example usage), but an unmergable dreambox branch is anything but encouraging. As Linus said: Branching is easy, merging is the excercise and mtn is not up to merging (of non content conflicts). z.