From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_write_request
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:31:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803121531.58649.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080312054156.GC4266@gollum.tnic>
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > The remaining pipeline stage allocation code is used for the next current
> > > pipeline stage (tape->merge_stage) and data buffer for an upcoming
> > > request. The so allocated pipeline stage is rewired into the tape struct
> > > thru idetape_switch_buffers() and used during the next request for
> > > copying user data into it (see e.g. idetape_chrdev_write()). In case the
> > > allocation fails, the current request is still attempted prior to failing.
> >
> > Is this really needed now that we've removed pipeline operation for write
> > requests?
>
> I did this simply to keep behavior changes at minimum - after removing the
> pipeline code completely this'll be simplified too.
BTW I see now how poorly I explained things the last time. :(
[ Sorry for that! ]
Our goal is not "pure" minimal behavior changes but minimal "behavior + code"
changes - IOW we are searching for the best balance for keeping both the old
behavior and code changes (and thus patch _complexity_) at the minimal level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-09 17:10 [PATCH 0/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline functionality-v2 Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] ide-tape: remove tape->cache_stage Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-10 23:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-11 6:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_write_request Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-10 23:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-12 5:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-12 13:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-12 14:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2008-03-09 17:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] ide-tape remove pipeline speed/control calculations Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-10 23:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-09 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline-specific code from idetape_add_chrdev_read_request() Borislav Petkov
2008-03-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-10 23:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-12 5:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-12 13:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-03-13 6:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2008-03-10 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] ide-tape: remove pipeline functionality-v2 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803121531.58649.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.