From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:37:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312233709.GA25530@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803130031190.14097@axis700.grange>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:32:48AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > It oopses at shutdown? I thought this was originally reported as a
> > "will not power off" which for a while was attributed to the cpufreq fix
> > that went into -rc2 or -rc3.
>
> As I already replied to Linus, no, it doesn't.
>
> > It would be interesting to see if reverting the pci_bus patch did
> > anything about the fact that we register the root PCI bus through two
> > different methods.
>
> You mean this: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120483340622706&w=2
Yes, the warnings go away as there is no more struct device to register,
but the big "PCI:" messages from the syslog at startup with the patch
reverted is what I am curious about.
I'll test more in a few hours, have to go herd the kids off to piano
lessons...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-10 23:14 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-11 0:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-11 2:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-11 3:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-11 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-11 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-12 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 20:32 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:27 ` pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24) Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:38 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 22:54 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-13 4:48 ` Greg KH
2008-03-13 5:44 ` Greg KH
2008-03-13 6:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-13 10:07 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-13 10:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-13 15:32 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 21:41 ` Len Brown
2008-03-12 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 22:34 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:16 ` Greg KH
2008-03-12 23:32 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-12 23:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-03-12 23:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:17 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-12 23:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-12 23:47 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-17 19:20 ` 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Jeff Garzik
2008-03-11 12:22 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-11 13:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-17 21:28 ` Thomas Meyer
2008-03-19 9:15 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-12 22:12 ` Christian Kujau
2008-03-12 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-13 5:03 ` David Chinner
2008-03-13 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080312233709.GA25530@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.