All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH (block.git) 0/2] IO CPU affinity update:
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:27:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080317192714.GJ17940@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47DE9D8F.8050402@hp.com>

On Mon, Mar 17 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
> Hi Jens -
> 
> Two patches: 
> 
> 1. Adds in the IRQ saving to generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt (as you had suggested).
> 2. Ensures a single IPI generated to get a remote function call handler going. 
> 
> So far it is working better than before on the 4-way IA64 w/ the mkfs/untar/make test suite - after 22 runs:
> 
> Part  RQ   MIN     AVG     MAX      Dev
> ----- --  ------  ------  ------  ------
>  mkfs  0  18.786  19.253  19.655   0.241
>  mkfs  1  18.639  19.182  19.786   0.293
> 
> untar  0  17.140  17.486  18.250   0.322
> untar  1  16.951  17.494  18.274   0.350
> 
>  make  0  22.927  24.310  34.339   2.287
>  make  1  22.863  23.788  24.189   0.333
> 
>  comb  0  59.478  61.049  70.320   2.142
>  comb  1  59.875  60.463  61.305   0.458
> 
>  psys  0   3.96%   4.14%   4.39%   0.100
>  psys  1   3.60%   3.85%   4.19%   0.176
> 
> So we're seeing reduced time (~1.0%) and reduced %sys to do it (7.0%).
> The tighter deviations for make with rq=1 may be interesting... :-)
> 
> I've compiled & booted the patches for x86_64 - rq=1 is working on
> that platform too.

This is starting to look pretty good! Thanks a lot for these results,
and the ->activated optimizations. I had a feeling the unstable results
were something like this, missing ipi's.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-17 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-17 16:34 [PATCH (block.git) 0/2] IO CPU affinity update: Alan D. Brunelle
2008-03-17 19:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-03-17 20:57   ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-03-18  8:41     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080317192714.GJ17940@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=Alan.Brunelle@hp.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.