From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:01:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080321113134.GA7620@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080321110804.GY20420@elte.hu>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:08:04PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I was trying to get the address of instruction to be executed next
> > after the kprobed instruction. But regs->eip in post_handler()
> > contains value which is useless to the user. It's pre-corrected value.
> > This value is difficult to use without access to resume_execution(),
> > which is not exported anyway. I moved the invocation of post_handler()
> > to *after* resume_execution(). Now regs->eip contains meaningful value
> > in post_handler().
> >
> > I do not think this change breaks any backward-compatibility. To make
> > meaning of the old value, post_handler() would need access to
> > resume_execution() which is not exported. I have difficulty to
> > believe that previous, uncorrected, regs->eip can be meaningfully used
> > in post_handler().
>
> thanks, i've added your patch to the .26 bucket of x86.git, but it would
> be nice to get an Ack/Nack from a kprobes person as well.
Ingo,
I've tested Yakov's more comprehensive patch on powerpc too. This has my
ack.
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-16 8:21 [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander() Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17 5:19 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 10:59 ` Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17 12:39 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 22:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-03-18 4:26 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 11:31 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2008-03-21 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 14:51 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 23:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080321113134.GA7620@in.ibm.com \
--to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=iler.ml@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.