From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, Solofo.Ramangalahy@bull.net,
dmonakhov@openvz.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Return unwritten buffer head when trying to read from prealloc space.
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:41:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080324081141.GA6581@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206137638.3605.36.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:13:58PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:48 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > ext4_ext_get_blocks returns number of blocks allocated with buffer head
> > unmapped for a read from prealloc space. This is needed so that delayed
> > allocation doesn't do block reservation for prealloc space since the blocks
> > are already resevred on disk. Fix ext4_ext_get_blocks to not return greater
> > than max_blocks and also mark the buffer head unwritten. Some code path tries
> > to read the block if buffer_head is not new and no uptodate. Marking the buffer
> > head unwritten avoid this reading.
> >
>
> Seems this patch fixes two bugs together, it would be nice to split to
> two as they cause two different problems.
Split patches here.
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patches-to-patchqueue/
>
> To fix the bh->b_size warning solof founds for delayed allocation, I
> would say we need to fix it in ext4_get_blocks_handle() (for indirect
> files) and ext4_ext_get_blocks()(for extent files) both, not allowing
> returning b_size greater than what the caller asking for. Also, the
> patch below seems only address the preallocation map case, we need to
> fix in in general block lookup case.
>
ext4_ext_get_blocks already make sure we doesn't return > max_blocks.
for normal allocation.
2694 out:
2695 if (allocated > max_blocks)
2696 allocated = max_blocks;
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-24 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-21 6:18 [RFC PATCH] ext4: Update i_diskzie during writepage for delayed allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-21 6:18 ` [RFC PATCH] ext4: Return unwritten buffer head when trying to read from prealloc space Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-03-21 22:13 ` Mingming Cao
2008-03-24 8:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-03-24 16:04 ` Mingming Cao
2008-03-21 22:08 ` [RFC PATCH] ext4: Update i_diskzie during writepage for delayed allocation Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080324081141.GA6581@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Solofo.Ramangalahy@bull.net \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.