All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Michael Meyer <mike65134@yahoo.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:27:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803251927.14211.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57127.43039.qm@web25812.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Michael Meyer wrote:
> 
> --- Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> schrieb:
> 
> > Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:47:50PM +0100, Michael
> > Meyer wrote:
> > > > Hi, 
> > > > 
> > > > what is the difference between booting a dual
> > core
> > > > machine with "maxcpus=1" or by deactivating the
> > second
> > > > core at run time with "echo 0 >
> > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online"?
> > > 
> > > maxcpus=1 should turn off the SMP alternative and
> > switch to UP only,
> > > optimising some locks and instructions.
> > 
> > CPU hot unplug will do the same. But it is unlikely
> > it accounts
> > for that much performance difference.
> > 
> > If he used maxcpus=0 it would make sense. maxcpus=0
> > disables
> > the IO-APIC which likely makes a large difference.
> > But it should
> > be actually slower.
> > 
> > There should be actually no difference in theory
> > between max_cpus=1
> > and hot unplug to one CPU. Might be some bug.
> 
> I had the following time values:
> 
> maxcpus=1:
> real	0m1.642s
> user	0m1.528s
> sys	0m0.068s
> 
> maxcpus=2 and 
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
> real	0m2.579s
> user	0m4.096s
> sys	0m0.160s

this above is the baseline, yes?
it is same as if you used no boot param
and did not touch the online file, yes?

> maxcpus=2 and
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online:
> real	0m3.757s
> user	0m3.632s
> sys	0m0.112s

Please post the contents of 
# grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/*
and also
grep . /proc/acpi/processor/*/power

My guess that the maxcpus=1 case benefits from turbo mode, aka EIDA.
That benefit, however, is subject to this bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
because for a single thread to run faster than the marketing MHz,
the other thread must be in deep-idle, which is prevented
by the bug above.

If your scaling_available_frequencies includes 2401000
then you probably have a turbo-mode enabled processor.

one way to verify this would be to disable turbo mode
by pegging the MHz like so:

# echo 2400000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
# echo 2400000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq

-Len

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-25 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-25 13:47 performance differences: "maxcpus=1" vs. "echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online" Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 14:08 ` Luciano Rocha
2008-03-25 16:38   ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:16   ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 17:23     ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:49       ` Wander Winkelhorst
2008-03-25 17:56         ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-25 17:57         ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 23:27       ` Len Brown [this message]
2008-03-26  7:26         ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-28 14:00     ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-28 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 20:55   ` Michael Meyer
2008-03-29 21:22     ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 22:16       ` Michael Meyer
2008-04-02 11:31         ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-29 23:22 ` Bernd Eckenfels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803251927.14211.lenb@kernel.org \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike65134@yahoo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.