From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level =?iso-8859-1?q?suspend=09and_hibernation_callbacks?= (rev. 2) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: <200803252048.43792.oliver@neukum.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp-out002.kontent.com ([81.88.40.216]:36111 "EHLO smtp-out002.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484AbYCYTsr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:48:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alexey Starikovskiy , Johannes Berg , LKML Am Dienstag, 25. M=E4rz 2008 15:33:22 schrieb Alan Stern: > > so I'd say a > > failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing d= uring > > sleep. >=20 > I'll go along with that. =A0If a device vanishes during sleep, the PM= =20 > core isn't responsible for unregistering it -- the device's subsystem= =20 > is. Yes, that makes sense. You are right. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757591AbYCYTs4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:48:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752520AbYCYTss (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:48:48 -0400 Received: from smtp-out002.kontent.com ([81.88.40.216]:36111 "EHLO smtp-out002.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484AbYCYTsr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:48:47 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum Organization: Novell To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level =?iso-8859-1?q?suspend=09and_hibernation_callbacks?= (rev. 2) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:48:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alexey Starikovskiy , Johannes Berg , LKML References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803252048.43792.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:33:22 schrieb Alan Stern: > > so I'd say a > > failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing during > > sleep. > > I'll go along with that.  If a device vanishes during sleep, the PM > core isn't responsible for unregistering it -- the device's subsystem > is. Yes, that makes sense. You are right. Regards Oliver