From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:13:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20080326101348.GD4437@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <7k4pawfnxs.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp> <7k1w5zf50j.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp> <18408.57824.846687.465435@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20080325175718.GT4411@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <7ky786dkup.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7ky786dkup.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Kouya Shimura Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Kouya Shimura, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 16:07:26 +0900, a écrit : > To be honest, I'm skeptical about the necessity of the flush > for a *emulated* IDE disk but shared SCSI disk. Emulation doesn't mean that we can afford losing the data. If the guest wants to have data flushed, it is because it needs the data to get to the platters, so we need to enforce that. Samuel