From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fbif: Add offset in resize event
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:24:01 +0000
Message-ID: <20080326112401.GH4437@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
References: <20080326110940.GA5636@implementation.uk.xensource.com>
	<C40FE127.1E5A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C40FE127.1E5A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Pat Campbell <plc@novell.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser, le Wed 26 Mar 2008 11:16:55 +0000, a écrit :
> Looks like we should slip these in quickly if they are acceptable, as the
> new field is not backward compatible with the original patchset from Pat
> Campbell?

Yes.
Actually I thought Pat would have already integrated that his patch.

Samuel