From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [68.230.241.45] (helo=fed1rmmtao101.cox.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JewAK-00066H-B0 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:45:28 +0100 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080327174524.YWFX28792.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:45:24 -0400 Received: from opus ([68.230.58.230]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 6HlQ1Z00C4y2VvG03HlQZG; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:45:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:45:24 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Message-ID: <20080327174524.GG4938@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <200803271217.41967.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> <200803271752.07855.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> <1206638031.4514.53.camel@dax.rpnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1206638031.4514.53.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: LEAD_SONAME? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:45:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 05:13:51PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 17:52 +0100, Tom Cooksey wrote: [snip] > > > Your options are: > > > - Ignore the warning > > My prefered option, but only if this is not causing my dissappearing library issue. > > > > > - Define a LEAD_SONAME of your primary lib > > > - More finegrained packaging. > > Do you mean doing having LEAD_SONAME_foo, LEAD_SONAME_bar, etc. ? That > > could work? > > No, select one e.g. if libfoo is the most "important", LEAD_SONAME = > "libfoo". Ah, but what's up with wildcards in the field (ie glib-2.0) ? Or ones that say "libfoo.so" (postgresql) or "libfoo.so.1" (uim) ? People guessing incorrectly at the value? Thanks! -- Tom Rini