From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
hadi@cyberus.ca
Subject: Re: 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:38:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328133845.GA14565@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328103809.GB23039@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:38:09PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
...
> Given that premise, we might as well let one CPU transmit as much
> as possible since moving to another CPU after each packet is going
> to bounce a lot more than just the spin lock and that is going to
> be expensive.
Considering this, I wonder why using this __LINK_STATE_QDISC_RUNNING
flag to control enqueuing as well would be a wrong idea? Wouldn't this
enforce pseudo affinity?
Regards,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 16:46 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X Matheos Worku
2008-03-26 17:31 ` Rick Jones
2008-03-26 20:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-26 20:26 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-26 21:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-26 21:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 10:33 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-27 23:18 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-03-27 23:45 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 0:02 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 0:19 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 0:34 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 1:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 1:38 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 10:29 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 11:06 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 11:29 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 12:19 ` jamal
2008-03-28 13:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 14:07 ` jamal
2008-03-28 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 23:25 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 14:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 1:58 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 10:33 ` jamal
2008-03-28 17:00 ` Matheos Worku
2008-03-28 10:38 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 13:38 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-03-28 13:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 14:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 14:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-28 15:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-28 15:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-29 1:06 ` Herbert Xu
2008-03-29 9:11 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328133845.GA14565@ami.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.