From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:09:03 +0100 From: Klaus Singvogel Message-ID: <20080328160903.GA26435@suse.de> References: <47EA99E8.8020007@licquia.org> <47EAC155.4040206@gmail.com> <20080327141959.GB5084@suse.de> <20080327153111.GB17559@suse.de> <20080327165506.GA7647@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] LSB 4.0 and printing List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org Johannes Meixner wrote: > On Mar 27 17:55 Klaus Singvogel wrote > [whether or not it may make sense or not > to have scanning software on a server] > [...] > All I wanted to point out is that running scanner drivers > on a server can be done and can make sense. > > I never said that running scanner drivers on a server > is the usual way to access a scanner. [...] Thanks for agreeing to us. To my knowledge LSB is only setting up a basic installation for a system. Therefore bloating the system unnecessary should be avoided. It's not about forbidding distributions to add the scanner packages on their media for server installation, and not about preventing users to install such packages on their servers, it's only about to leave packages in the basic setup away, where a common use doesn't make sense. Kindly regards, Klaus. -- Klaus Singvogel - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg - Germany Phone: +49-911-74053-0 GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D 1994-06-27 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)