From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.132.243] (helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JgMqc-0002X3-Pu for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:27:03 +0200 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b38so445709ana.6 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.251.18 with SMTP id y18mr16391607anh.88.1206980820859; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ( [74.254.162.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm748232agc.9.2008.03.31.09.26.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT) From: E Robertson To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:26:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200803310907.56781.e.robertson.svg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200803311126.50655.e.robertson.svg@gmail.com> Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org, Koen Kooi Subject: Re: New OE user question X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:27:03 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 4856 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14372257.aJkv8zZDrC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart14372257.aJkv8zZDrC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 31 March 2008 11:12:03 am Koen Kooi wrote: > Leon Woestenberg schreef: > | On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:07 PM, E Robertson > > wrote: > |> Hi All, > |> > |> I'm brand new to OE and I've been following the documentation steps > > along the > > |> way. I notice the documentation is either missing sections or not > > clear and > > | Good catch, our default example seems to be unmaintained. Probably > | the "generic" distribution lacks good maintenance, at least for this > | configuration. > | > | DISTRO =3D "generic-uclibc" > | > | The error which stops your build is: > |> | Unable to determine version for kernel headers > |> | provided in > | > | Can someone suggest a saner distribution for this Samsung chip? > > angstrom maybe? > > It's an atmel chip, and atmel itself recommends angstrom: Yes, I'm using an atmel chip but not necessarily going with atmel=20 recommendations. Eventually I would build a custom distro (on a custom boar= d)=20 unless Angstrom is the best way to go. Seeing that I'm new, I don't know=20 anything about Angstrom so my decision point is a aways off. regards, Ezban --nextPart14372257.aJkv8zZDrC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH8RDK2sS31XKVICURAmAfAJ0TxKDlBPM9TTCBPUMkNJsDfQGBtACeONN4 qaq6sw6WV80cHNBnNDODvf4= =I/tt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14372257.aJkv8zZDrC--