From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Customize sched domain via cpuset
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:29:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401132924.GI29105@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207050968.8514.721.camel@twins>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:56:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 13:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> >
> > > Using cpuset, now we can partition the system into multiple sched domains.
> > > Then, how about providing different characteristics for each domains?
> >
> > Did you actually see much improvement in any relevant workload
> > from tweaking these parameters? If yes what did you change?
> > And how much did it gain?
> >
> > Ideally the kernel should perform well without much tweaking
> > out of the box, simply because most users won't tweak. Adding a
> > lot of such parameters would imply giving up on good defaults which
> > is not a good thing.
>
> >From what I understand they need very aggressive idle balancing; much
> more so than what is normally healty.
>
> I can see how something like that can be useful when you have a lot of
> very short running tasks. These could pile up on a few cpus and leave
> others idle.
Could the scheduler auto tune itself to this situation?
e.g. when it sees a row of very high run queue inbalances increase the
frequency of the idle balancer?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 11:26 [PATCH 1/2] Customize sched domain via cpuset Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-01 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-01 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-01 13:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-04-01 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-01 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-01 11:55 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-01 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-02 8:39 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-02 11:14 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-03 3:21 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-03 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-03 12:56 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-03 13:14 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-04 9:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] Customize sched domain via cpuset (v2) Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-04 9:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-10 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14 1:45 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2008-04-14 15:38 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401132924.GI29105@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.