All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression (gdm no longer shuts down) - 2.4.24.x and 2.6.25
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:55:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401185532.GA10046@deepthought> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080325232417.8447318e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:24:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Looks like another post-2.6.24 regression for the list.
> 
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:07:14 +0000 Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  on one of my boxes, I've got a problem with gdm and kernels newer
> > than 2.6.24 (tested on 2.6.24.2, 2.6.24.4).  If I try to restart or
> > shut down from gdm, the window disappears but the X background remains
> > and the box stays in runlevel 5 until I switch to a tty and shut it
> > down (as root) or give it a 3-fingered salute to reboot.
> > 
> >  The same with 2.6.25-rc6-git8.
> > 
> >  The only oddity in the logs is a large block of
> > Mar 24 13:49:29 bluesbreaker gdm[2554]: Handling user message:
> > 'GET_CONFIG greeter/SetPosition :0'
> > Mar 24 13:49:29 bluesbreaker gdmlogin[2995]:   Got response: 'OK
> > false'
> > Mar 24 13:49:29 bluesbreaker gdmlogin[2995]: Sending command:
> > 'CLOSE'
> > Mar 24 13:49:29 bluesbreaker gdm[2554]: Handling user message:
> > 'CLOSE'
> > Mar 24 13:49:29 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login: In
> > loop
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login:
> > end verify for ''
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login: No
> > login/Bad login
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login: In
> > loop
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login:
> > end verify for ''
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login: No
> > login/Bad login
> > Mar 24 13:49:35 bluesbreaker gdm[2562]: gdm_slave_wait_for_login: In
> > loop
> > ... about 165 repeats of these 3 lines, it seems to stop the
> > messages on its own, then I ran shutdown and got the normal
> > 
> > Mar 24 13:50:02 bluesbreaker shutdown[3000]: shutting down for
> > system halt
> > Mar 24 13:50:02 bluesbreaker init: Switching to runlevel: 0
> > Mar 24 13:50:08 bluesbreaker logger: /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc called with
> > arg 0
> > Mar 24 13:50:08 bluesbreaker logger: /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K01cups called
> > with arg stop
> >  and so forth.
> > 
> >  Yes, I've got a lot of debugging in there, I used this box to find
> > out why gdm-2.20 gave me a messy shutdown, and left it in after I
> > reverted to gdm-2.18.
> > 
> >  This only happens with 64-bit kernels, I've been using it as i686
> > without any issues.
> > 
> >  While trying to debug this, I reverted the two drm patches from
> > 2.6.24.1 (in 2.6.24.4) and normal behaviour was restored.  I forgot
> > to change the extraversion, which meant my modules were overwritten.
> > When I later went back to the "bad 2.6.24.4" it shut down correctly.
> > Examination showed i2c_viapro was the key - if I rmmod it in
> > 2.6.24.x, gdm works correctly.  For the record, my 32-bit config is
> > very different, but does include i2c_viapro as a module.
> > 
> >  So, I started to think it might be an i2c problem.  But with
> > 2.6.25-rc6-git8 I can't get gdm to work correctly, neither by
> > reverting the patches, nor with rmmod, so for the moment I'm in the
> > dark.  My notes say that I managed to fix it one time on -rc6-git8,
> > by 'rmmod i2c_viapro' before logging out, but all subsequent attempts
> > to repeat this have failed.
> > 
> >  FWIW, the via ISA bridge is a 1106:3227 (VIA_8237, also
> > described as VT8237R in i2c-viapro).
> > 
> >  Going back to 2.6.24.4 and reverting only the following patch,
> > normal behaviour is restored:
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/drm_vm.c b/drivers/char/drm/drm_vm.c
> > index e8d50af..ef5e6b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/drm/drm_vm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/drm/drm_vm.c
> > @@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ static int drm_mmap_dma(struct file *filp,
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >         vma->vm_ops = &drm_vm_dma_ops;
> >  
> >         vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED;   /* Don't swap */
> > +       vma->vm_flags |= VM_DONTEXPAND;
> >  
> >         vma->vm_file = filp;    /* Needed for drm_vm_open() */
> >         drm_vm_open_locked(vma);
> > @@ -655,6 +656,7 @@ static int drm_mmap_locked(struct file *filp,
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >                 return -EINVAL; /* This should never happen. */
> >         }
> >         vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED;   /* Don't swap */
> > +       vma->vm_flags |= VM_DONTEXPAND;
> >  
> >         vma->vm_file = filp;    /* Needed for drm_vm_open() */
> >         drm_vm_open_locked(vma);
> > 
> >  I haven't been following 2.6.25 closely, but I assume that what got
> > applied to 2.6.24-stable was only part of the change to 2.6.25, and
> > perhaps some other part of it is affecting me ?
> > 
> >  .config.gz for 2.6.25-rc6-git8 is attached.
> > 
> > Ken
> > -- 
> > das eine Mal als Trag__die, das andere Mal als Farce
> > 
 I'm back on this with very mixed results - looks as if what I
reverted against 2.6.24.4 might not be the problem.  I've seen
failure to shutdown/reboot from gdm on versions of 2.6.24.n (>
2.6.24, with the patch above reverted) and intermittent failures in
2.6.25-rc.  Today's test results, with i2c-viapro removed from the
config (separate thread, it's a red herring): (success means it
rebooted or shut down, failure means gdm hung with just an X
background) - after failure, I shutdown or reboot from a tty)

2.6.25-rc1 success
2.6.25-rc1 success (used it to build rc7)
2.6.25-rc7 failure
2.6.25-rc1 failure (rebooted from rc7, wanted to shutdown).

 Looks like I'll have to bisect, and it may be nothing at all to do
with the patch above.  All I know for certain is that I haven't seen
the problem on vanilla 2.6.24, and it's intermittent.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-01 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-25 20:07 Regression (gdm no longer shuts down) - 2.4.24.x and 2.6.25 Ken Moffat
2008-03-26 15:19 ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]   ` <20080326161934.7eae544f-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-26 17:37     ` Ken Moffat
2008-03-26 17:37       ` Ken Moffat
2008-03-26 19:10       ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]         ` <20080326201031.7c2cefb2-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-27  1:35           ` Trent Piepho
2008-03-27  1:35             ` [i2c] " Trent Piepho
2008-03-27  8:26             ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-27 12:00               ` Ken Moffat
2008-04-01 19:05         ` Ken Moffat
     [not found] ` <20080325232417.8447318e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-01 18:55   ` Ken Moffat [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080401185532.GA10046@deepthought \
    --to=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.