From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756929AbYDBFbn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:31:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751044AbYDBFbc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:31:32 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:52853 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbYDBFbc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:31:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:31:27 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Vasily Tarasov Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, containers@linux-foundation.com, dev@openvz.org, xemul@openvz.org, vtaras@openvz.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] cgroups: block: cfq: I/O bandwidth controlling subsystem for CGroups based on CFQ Message-Id: <20080402003127.d22e9d3e.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1203058414.042372.2088.nullmailer@me> References: <1203058414.042372.2088.nullmailer@me> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A couple of details: 1) Your clock is way off. These patches have a date stamp of Feb 15, but were actually sent out March 21 (and I'm behind in my reading of lkml - sorry ;). 2) Please put a different Subject on each path ... not just the N/M patch number, but use different words to describe each patch. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214