All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bruno randolf <bruno@thinktube.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, jirislaby@gmail.com,
	mickflemm@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	flamingice@sourmilk.net, jbenc@suse.cz,
	"Ivan Seskar" <Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
	"Haris Kremo" <harisk@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
	"Kishore Ramachandran" <kishore@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
	"Sanjit Kaul" <sanjitkaul@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:55:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804031055.43707.bruno@thinktube.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890804021619k4e8fea71i152c5dafe010ddfc@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 03 April 2008 08:19:07 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >  > Jean, if range->max_qual.level is set to -110 does this mean sig=
nal
> >  > level can be set only from -110 up to 0 ? Is max_qual.level supp=
osed
> >  > to be the weakest signal possibly detected?
> >
> >         Yes. This is what make most sense.
>
> How so? I think I must still be seriously misunderstanding something
> then. If the weakest signal possibly detected is -110 dbm it does not
> imply the strongest signal will be 0 dbm. On the contrary, I expect t=
o
> be able to receive frames with positive dbm values. For example, if I
> hook up a card's antenna which is transmitting at 20dbm to another
> card's antenna directly with cables with 10 dbm attenuator in the
> middle I expect to see 10 dbm on the reception side. Therefore
> shouldn't the max be close the max allowed, or at least expected,
> EIRP?

from a paper, from Joshua Bardwell, also available at:
http://madwifi.org/attachment/wiki/UserDocs/RSSI/you_believe_D100201.pd=
f

"Bear in mind that, realistically, stations will nearly always receive =
signals=20
below 1 mW, unless they are very close (within a few feet) of the acces=
s=20
point. Therefore, the power levels below 1 mW are critical to the opera=
tion=20
of an 802.11 chipset."
=2E..
"Realistically, 1 mW is about the maximum power that a station is likel=
y to=20
receive, and the station would have to be within inches of a powerful A=
P to=20
receive even that much! (That might surprise you, but remember that 802=
=2E11=20
NICs can receive signals down to about 10-7 to 10-9 mW, so a =E2=80=9Cw=
eak=E2=80=9D 1 mW=20
signal is actually millions of times stronger than the weakest signal t=
he=20
card could discern.)"
=2E..
"Consequently, the RSSI ranges used by the 802.11 chipset manufacturers=
 don=E2=80=99t=20
measure at all above 1 mW. The maximum RSSI value for all 802.11 chipse=
ts and=20
NICs represents a power level that is less than 1 mW. Everything betwee=
n 1 mW=20
and 100 mW is simply considered =E2=80=9C100 %=E2=80=9D RSSI."

bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-03  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-26 12:30 [PATCH] mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units Bruno Randolf
2008-03-26 22:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-03-27  0:19   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-03-27  2:47     ` bruno randolf
2008-03-27 16:52       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-03-31  6:32         ` bruno randolf
2008-03-31 17:47           ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-04-02  3:06             ` bruno randolf
2008-04-02 23:19     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-04-02 23:56       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-04-03  1:55       ` bruno randolf [this message]
2008-03-27  2:07   ` bruno randolf
2008-04-02 19:27     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-04-03  2:05       ` bruno randolf
2008-03-27 12:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-28 10:52   ` bruno randolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804031055.43707.bruno@thinktube.com \
    --to=bruno@thinktube.com \
    --cc=Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=harisk@winlab.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=kishore@winlab.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
    --cc=sanjitkaul@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.