From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.93]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JhyLb-0005WO-87 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:41:39 +0000 From: David Brownell To: "Kyungmin Park" Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:17:04 -0700 References: <713171.37644.qm@web26213.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1207357870.3224.89.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804041917.05294.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michael Trimarchi , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Josh Boyer , dwmw2@infradead.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 04 April 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > So I now changed the kmalloc eraseblock to vmalloc at both jffs2 and mtd-utils. I hope you meant: vmalloc changed to kmalloc? And mtd-utils is userspace, not kernel, so it can't care... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:17:04 -0700 Message-ID: <200804041917.05294.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <713171.37644.qm@web26213.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1207357870.3224.89.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-xIg/pKzrS19vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org, linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Michael Trimarchi , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Josh Boyer , dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton To: "Kyungmin Park" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 April 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > So I now changed the kmalloc eraseblock to vmalloc at both jffs2 and mtd-utils. I hope you meant: vmalloc changed to kmalloc? And mtd-utils is userspace, not kernel, so it can't care... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751745AbYDEClw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750941AbYDEClm (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:41:42 -0400 Received: from smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.93]:40630 "HELO smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750749AbYDECll (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:41:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=WITA1DsszNB/OJxX9Nps2YQmaUVp3SU7I9lgmaOpSw0IUByqWWj3CWeqNhUHok+r+qTBGeMf4WlEDfcZVjIIsquztPC5BhrCZFx8pUwpBtzH7qdKnaa/gzJDupmBMwIh5IRWTRY1fwhXYCOiqqqFtBI0lL5nChwUOU3I3dNrBCM= ; X-YMail-OSG: x_BKMdgVM1kz21D.1pEdIk0PqyVHXhlCA0cDUloy3bsyqqaOIK99b_vUR6Vz6brzWdQQOhpRgg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: "Kyungmin Park" Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:17:04 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Josh Boyer" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Michael Trimarchi" , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, "Andrew Morton" , dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk References: <713171.37644.qm@web26213.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1207357870.3224.89.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804041917.05294.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 04 April 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > So I now changed the kmalloc eraseblock to vmalloc at both jffs2 and mtd-utils. I hope you meant: vmalloc changed to kmalloc? And mtd-utils is userspace, not kernel, so it can't care...