From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.253.16.26] (helo=barracuda.pager.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JisjD-0001hJ-4c for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:53:47 +0200 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1207580024-4c0c001f0000-aWHRdb X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.1.240:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from [192.168.1.71] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barracuda.pager.net (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id ECC103A27F for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:53:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([192.168.1.1]) by barracuda.pager.net with ESMTP id MEX0nDJCpMlHjaRj for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:53:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Geoffrey Wossum Organization: Long Range Systems To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [oe] Building multiple gdb-cross targets Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:53:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200804041057.55738.geoffrey@pager.net> <200804041346.08584.geoffrey@pager.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200804070953.49658.geoffrey@pager.net> X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.168.1.1] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1207580024 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at pager.net Subject: Re: Building multiple gdb-cross targets X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:53:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 04 April 2008 03:54:36 pm Leon Woestenberg wrote: > > From the avr32linux wiki entry on kernel debugging: > > avr32-gdb (the standalone debugger) or avr32-linux-gdb. Preferably the > > former since it has the ability to read and write system registers. > > Why would the linux-gdb not be able to touch those registers? Don't know for sure, but I'd guess it has something to do with how Atmel patched gdb. --- Geoffrey