From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2909DDE22 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:14:57 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Question on mpc52xx_common.c Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:14:42 +0200 References: <47FAA0A8.7050602@genesi-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <47FAA0A8.7050602@genesi-usa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200804080414.42867.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Detlev Zundel List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Matt Sealey wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > >=20 > > Sure, why not? =A0If the firmware has already set it up correctly and no > > devices using it are in use, then the kernel should be okay. =A0:-) > > That said, I can't imagine choosing to not put the cdm node into the > > device tree. >=20 > *ahem* Efika. Maybe we should just give up on making the efika boot with its regular device tree and instead add a boot wrapper that either fixes up the data provided by its firmware or just adds a proper dt blob? Arnd <><