From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JjE5d-0004i6-KV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:42:21 +0000 From: Arnd Bergmann To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:59 +0200 References: <20080401181308.512473173@logfs.org> <200804080230.17426.arnd@arndb.de> <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> In-Reply-To: <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804081542.00333.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 08 April 2008, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > "Logfs file system" might make sense. =C2=A0LOGFS_FS is something I would > rather avoid. =C2=A0For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repetitio= n, > redundancy and superfluous information. >=20 How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig. Arnd <>< From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754087AbYDHNmb (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:42:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752779AbYDHNmV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:42:21 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:58594 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751772AbYDHNmU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:42:20 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <20080401181308.512473173@logfs.org> <200804080230.17426.arnd@arndb.de> <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> In-Reply-To: <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804081542.00333.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Wj8B3TS+X0zFzWE1QIF3Cmgh62qPvLSlSJ1C oN9N3qbcO1QQLHgTI/1OwmgCimWIfFskoXcoRfrSTQ//m7o/w9 pzC8EZbfo3gll/RF144Nw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jörn Engel wrote: > "Logfs file system" might make sense.  LOGFS_FS is something I would > rather avoid.  For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repetition, > redundancy and superfluous information. > How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig. Arnd <>< From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [patch 1/15] Makefiles and Kconfig Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <200804081542.00333.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20080401181308.512473173@logfs.org> <200804080230.17426.arnd@arndb.de> <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:58594 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751772AbYDHNmU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:42:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080408083316.GA31262@logfs.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 08 April 2008, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > "Logfs file system" might make sense. =C2=A0LOGFS_FS is something I w= ould > rather avoid. =C2=A0For some reason my brain reacts strongly to repet= ition, > redundancy and superfluous information. >=20 How about LOG_FS then? I don't think there is a really good argument either way, but a large majority uses the *_FS notation in Kconfig. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html