From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754919AbYDHVvE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:51:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752806AbYDHVuy (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:50:54 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36320 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752772AbYDHVux convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:50:53 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Alessandro Suardi" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 23:50:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: LKML , "Adrian Bunk" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Natalie Protasevich" References: <200804071459.35628.rjw@sisk.pl> <5a4c581d0804071644u6922d412i943c0094dc7e2601@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5a4c581d0804071644u6922d412i943c0094dc7e2601@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804082350.44166.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 8 of April 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote: > 2008/4/7 Rafael J. Wysocki : > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10384 > > Subject : 2.6.25-rc6-git2: warn_on_slowpath for tcp_simple_retransmit > > Submitter : Alessandro Suardi > > Date : 2008-04-02 00:28 (6 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/1/408 > > Handled-By : Ilpo Järvinen > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120756760521961&w=2 > > This one is very difficult to verify. It happened exactly once in > now 20 days... I'll be away from the box until the weekend, > when I'll compile whatever kernel-of-the-day with Ilpo's fix > on top, if it isn't in mainline by then, and... well, keep the > torrents alive with an eye on the kernel logs. > > Not sure what's the best thing to do with such a hard to > reproduce issue. Perhaps marking it fixed by Ilpo's patch, > and if it pops up again file a new bug linking it to the entry > in bugzilla ? Well, I will close it as "unreproducible". You can always reopen it if the problem occurs again. Thanks, Rafael