All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:13:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804090313.34805.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207760125.4056.30.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com>

On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> > > Hmm, what if the wakealarm is set by mistake?
> > > is there any chance that user can fix it?
> > 
> > Certainly; there are several ways to turn an alarm off.
> > With sysfs, just write a time in the past, as I recall...
> > 
> > If you're concerned about accidents, think of it this way:
> > the proposed patch would make it *REALLY EASY* to have
> > accidents with sysfs that bork the alarm state, which can
> > have been set by some task that's relying on it.
> 
> But how to solve the following case?
> 
> It is assumed that the RTC alarm is set by some task and not fired (It
> will be fired after 20 minutes). The system enters the sleeping state
> and is required to be resumed after some time(For example: ten minutes).
> 
> How to set the RTC alarm?

You mean, how to decide which alarm setting should "win"?
If sysfs accidents aren't going to trump everything else.

That's a fair question.  I don't think there's a good answer
to that with today's infrastructure.  Arguably, there should
be the notion of a number of clients, each of which get told
when the alarm they request fires.  But today, there's only
a single alarm, and a single client.

- Dave




  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-09 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-09  6:34 [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09  7:34 ` David Brownell
2008-04-09  7:46   ` Zhang, Rui
2008-04-09  8:27     ` David Brownell
2008-04-09 16:55       ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09 10:13         ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-04-10 11:08           ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  5:13             ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 11:04           ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  3:46             ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 12:44               ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  5:12                 ` David Brownell
2008-04-11  6:30                 ` Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804090313.34805.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.