From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
pinskia@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:05:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410150544.GI10019@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804100741430.3143@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:46:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > So in summary valid section patterns are either
> > .section / .previous or .pushsection .section .popsection
>
> The thing is, we'd be much better off with some sanity checking in the
> assembler.
>
> Which is likely not going to happen - oh well.
A simple way to detect it on the assembler level would be checking
that the section is the same after #NO_APP as before #APP
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-09 23:04 [PATCH] pop previous section in alternative.c Steven Rostedt
2008-04-09 23:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 0:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 8:47 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 9:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-04-10 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 14:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 18:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-10 15:05 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-04-10 15:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 16:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 16:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-10 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 17:32 ` Andrew Pinski
2008-04-10 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-10 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-13 15:27 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-04-10 16:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-10 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080410150544.GI10019@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pinskia@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.