From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3ALQC5Y031218 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:26:12 -0400 Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m3ALQB8I007074 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:26:12 GMT From: Paul Moore To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:25:59 -0400 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov References: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> In-Reply-To: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Just a quick follow-up on testing, I've run this for a few hours on two Fedora systems with both labeled and unlabeled IPsec in use with SAs rekeying every 5 minutes and didn't notice anything evil. At this point I'd strip the "RFC" from the patchset and ask that they be considered for inclusion in 2.6.26 assuming there are no objections. -- paul moore linux @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:25:59 -0400 Message-ID: <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:18778 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756875AbYDJV0C (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:26:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Just a quick follow-up on testing, I've run this for a few hours on two Fedora systems with both labeled and unlabeled IPsec in use with SAs rekeying every 5 minutes and didn't notice anything evil. At this point I'd strip the "RFC" from the patchset and ask that they be considered for inclusion in 2.6.26 assuming there are no objections. -- paul moore linux @ hp