From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkkyz-0007vY-V7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:01:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkkyz-0007up-4a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:01:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkkyy-0007ue-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:01:48 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkkyy-0005ph-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:01:48 -0400 Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080412190538.UDLV11232.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:05:38 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.26.151]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080412190357.XGLC17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:03:57 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkkyr-0000DN-Dc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:01:41 +0100 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:01:41 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure cleanup Message-ID: <20080412190141.GA810@miranda.arrow> References: <20080411192401.GA30794@miranda.arrow> <200804121441.16416.paul@codesourcery.com> <20080412152025.GA32663@miranda.arrow> <20080412171320.GA532@miranda.arrow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:52:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Stuart Brady writes: > > Oh, good point. Are the backslashes necessary, though? > > So that the newline is ignored. D'oh. Sorry about that. I *really* wasn't thinking straight. :( Thanks, -- Stuart Brady