From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752358AbYDMElw (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750741AbYDMEll (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:41:41 -0400 Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([70.167.247.36]:42629 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750700AbYDMElk (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:41:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:41:26 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 Message-ID: <20080413044126.GA27671@hash.localnet> References: <1208041121-26787-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <20080412170304.54f139e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413033344.GA27494@hash.localnet> <20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:55:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Yes, pursuing the FUSE implementation sounds a better approach - it avoids > burdening the kernel with a filesysstem which few will be interested in and > is more practical for use by those who _are_ interested in it. Roger that, thanks. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com