From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755734AbYDMIGM (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:06:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751662AbYDMIF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:05:56 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:58147 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751444AbYDMIFz (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:05:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:05:54 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bob Copeland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omfs: add inode routines Message-ID: <20080413080554.GC9622@infradead.org> References: <1208041121-26787-3-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1208041121-26787-3-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Looks good. Minor nitpick: > +static void omfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) > +{ > + struct omfs_sb_info *sbi = OMFS_SB(sb); > + if (sbi) { This if check is no needed, as your fill_super method never returns success without setting it up.