From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
joe@perches.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remember the message level for multi-line output
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:34:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413113453.GE29599@tull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080413074007.GE20332@elte.hu>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 09:40:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Restructure the logic so the processing of the leading 3 characters of
> > each input line is in one place, regardless whether printk_time is
> > enabled.
>
> hm, i'm not sure about the change itself (printks are often random, so
> the output to the console would depend on printk ordering), but the
> combined effect seems to be a nice cleanup that reduces the linecount:
As I understand the code, if a single call to printk() includes multiple
lines of text then those lines will be contiguous in the console output.
So if one thread does printk(KERN_ERR "aaaaa\nbbbbb\n") and another
does printk(KERN_ERR "ccccc\n") then it's not possible for the buffer
to contain "<3>aaaaa\n<3>ccccc\n<3>bbbbb\n".
On the other hand, multiple calls to printk won't necessarily have
contiguous output. This affects code like arch/blackfin/kernel/traps.c
as I described in another thread which behaves like it's the only one
doing printk().
> > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> so how about splitting it into two, first the code restructuring then a
> small add-on that does your feature? Does this make sense to you? This
> way, even if the feature ends up not being applied, we'll have your nice
> cleanup :-)
Can do.
Nick.
--
PGP Key ID = 0x418487E7 http://www.nick-andrew.net/
PGP Key fingerprint = B3ED 6894 8E49 1770 C24A 67E3 6266 6EB9 4184 87E7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-13 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-12 16:18 [PATCH] printk: Remember the message level for multi-line output Nick Andrew
2008-04-12 16:42 ` Nick Andrew
2008-04-13 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 11:34 ` Nick Andrew [this message]
2008-04-13 11:57 ` Nick Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080413113453.GE29599@tull.net \
--to=nick@nick-andrew.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.