From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: menage@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot cgroup questions
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:42:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080414134203.ea5a7de7.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47FE5655.10900@qualcomm.com>
Max K wrote:
> I agree in general. In this particular case additional grouping introduces
> even more hierarchy. I seems to me that
> "irqN -> cpu1, cpu2, cpu3"
> is a very simple, straightforward relationship. Whereas
> "irqN -> groupX"
> "groupX -> cpu1"
> "groupX -> cpu2"
> "groupX -> cpu3"
> Is not that straightforward.
Clearly, yes, the first is simpler than the second.
The question is which is correct.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-14 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 1:23 boot cgroup questions Max Krasnyansky
2008-03-12 1:27 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-12 2:34 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-03-12 2:36 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-12 2:53 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-03-12 3:09 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-12 3:39 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-03-12 4:59 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 18:24 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-12 18:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 19:11 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-12 19:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 20:08 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-12 20:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 22:29 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-12 23:30 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-13 0:57 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-13 7:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 18:03 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-04-14 18:39 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-09 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 11:17 ` IRQ affinities (was: boot cgroup questions) Paul Jackson
2008-05-09 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 12:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-09 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 12:36 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-09 17:43 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 1:21 ` IRQ affinities Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-21 1:14 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-21 4:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-21 16:18 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-21 6:34 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 17:58 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-04-14 18:42 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-03-13 7:12 ` boot cgroup questions Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:24 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-04-10 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 23:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-13 0:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-12 19:16 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-12 19:24 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-12 19:30 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080414134203.ea5a7de7.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.